Training

Free Self-Paced Runtime Governance Learning Series

AGCP Runtime Governance Training

Learn the core ideas of deterministic runtime governance through six foundational readings, companion video briefings, and short knowledge checks.

This self-paced series is designed for professionals, students, architects, engineers, governance practitioners, risk teams, auditors, and researchers who want to understand how governance moves from policy and oversight into execution-time control for AI-enabled, agentic, autonomous, multi-agent, and programmatic systems.

Begin with two short orientation resources: Runtime Governance in Plain English, followed by the AI Runtime Governance Overview. Then work through the six modules in sequence. For each module, watch the briefing, read the source paper, and complete the corresponding Check Your Knowledge quiz. After the six readings, use the AGCP Runtime Governance Assessment Readiness Check and then return to the AI Runtime Governance Learning Guide for an integrated review of the complete reading series.

How to Use This Self-Paced Series

1. Watch

Video Briefing

Begin each module with the embedded video for an orientation to the problem, architecture, core concepts, and major takeaways.

2. Read

Core Reading

Read the source paper in full. The papers are the authoritative basis for the concepts covered in the learning series.

3. Check

Check Your Knowledge

Complete the short quiz after each reading to confirm understanding of the paper’s core distinctions, architecture, and implications.

This is a learning pathway, not an AGCP conformance assessment. The quizzes are educational knowledge checks. The readiness check at the end is a pre-assessment diagnostic and does not establish an AGCP conformance result.

Before the Six Core Readings

Runtime Governance Orientation

Before beginning the six core papers, start with these two orientation resources. They provide a plain-English introduction to the runtime-governance problem, followed by a more structured overview of the architecture and concepts developed across the reading series.

Orientation 1

Runtime Governance in Plain English

Begin here for a concise, accessible explanation of why AI runtime governance is needed and what it means to govern consequential AI-enabled actions at execution time.

Orientation 2

AI Runtime Governance Overview

Continue with this overview before starting the papers. It provides a broader architectural orientation to runtime governance and prepares the learner for the concepts developed in the six core readings.

These two orientation resources do not have associated knowledge-check quizzes. The quizzes begin with Module 1 and correspond to the six core papers.

Companion Learning Resource

AI Runtime Governance Learning Guide

Use the AI Runtime Governance Learning Guide as a companion to the six-paper series. The guide explains the major lessons in each paper, highlights the concepts to watch for, and shows how the readings build on one another as a coherent runtime-governance architecture.

You can review the guide before beginning the series for orientation, revisit it between modules to reinforce the main lessons, or use it after completing the readings as a structured synthesis of the full learning pathway.

Six Core Readings

The series moves from the broad execution-governance problem, through runtime architecture and the AGCP control-plane model, into formal execution semantics, operating semantics, and multi-agent enterprise application.

Module 1

Runtime Execution Governance for AI Systems

A Cross-Platform Synthesis and Architectural Framework

Willis, J. M. (2026). Runtime Execution Governance for AI Systems: A Cross-Platform Synthesis and Architectural Framework. Sustainable Future Tech, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19341177

Video: Runtime Execution Governance.mp4 Open this video on YouTube AGCP YouTube channel

Focus: Why AI governance must address the point where a proposed consequential action becomes operational effect.

  • Proposed consequential action and execution governance
  • Admissibility, context, and canonical state
  • Commit boundary and governance receipt
  • Action-level runtime control rather than model-level review alone

Read the Paper

Read the complete paper before taking the knowledge check.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Test your understanding of the paper’s central architecture and distinctions.

Take the Quiz
Module 2

Runtime Governance Architecture

Consistent Governance Execution for Enterprise Systems and Autonomous Agents

Willis, J. M. (2026). Runtime Governance Architecture: Consistent Governance Execution for Enterprise Systems and Autonomous Agents. Sustainable Future Tech, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286845

Video: Runtime Governance Architecture.mp4 Open this video on YouTube AGCP YouTube channel

Focus: How governance evaluation can be externalized and executed consistently across heterogeneous systems before consequential execution.

  • Governance control plane and execution-plane separation
  • Governance submissions, evaluation pipelines, and execution gates
  • Lifecycle state and governance ledger
  • Binding governance decisions to operational outcomes

Read the Paper

Study the architecture that provides the broader framework for deterministic runtime governance.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Confirm your understanding of the governance and execution-plane architecture.

Take the Quiz
Module 3

AGCP: A Deterministic Execution-Layer Governance Control Plane

For Autonomous and Programmatic Systems

Willis, J. M. (2026). AGCP: A Deterministic Execution-Layer Governance Control Plane for Autonomous and Programmatic Systems. Sustainable Future Tech, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19323672

Focus: The concrete AGCP control-plane model for governing state-changing actions before they become operationally reachable.

  • Governed action proposal and action envelope
  • Five-stage pipeline: validate, evaluate, authorize, and commit
  • Structural refusal and append-only governance ledger
  • Ledger-derived lifecycle state and commit-bound execution

Read the Paper

Read the foundational AGCP control-plane architecture paper.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Test your understanding of AGCP’s deterministic pipeline, artifacts, lifecycle, and commit semantics.

Take the Quiz
Module 4

Formal Execution Semantics and Safety Invariants

For Governance Control Planes in Autonomous Systems

Willis, J. M. (2026). Formal Execution Semantics and Safety Invariants for Governance Control Planes in Autonomous Systems. Sustainable Future Tech, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19241732

Video: Formal Execution Semantics.mp4 Open this video on YouTube AGCP YouTube channel

Focus: The formal lifecycle, ordering, determinism, and invariant properties needed to make runtime governance inspectable, testable, and replayable.

  • State-transition systems and lifecycle semantics
  • Safety invariants and impossible-transition protections
  • Deterministic ordering and decision consistency
  • Replayability as a governance assurance property

Read the Paper

Study the formal execution model and the safety properties underlying deterministic governance control planes.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Confirm your understanding of lifecycle states, invariants, ordering, and replay.

Take the Quiz
Module 5

AGCP Operating Model and Semantic Architecture

Proposal Schemas, Governance Context, Canonical State, and Commit-Bound Execution Semantics for Autonomous Systems

Willis, J. (2026). AGCP Operating Model and Semantic Architecture: Proposal Schemas, Governance Context, Canonical State, and Commit-Bound Execution Semantics for Autonomous Systems. Sustainable Future Tech, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20330062

Focus: The semantic contract connecting a proposed action, governance context, qualified canonical state, governance decision, and commit.

  • Proposal schema and governance context envelope
  • Canonical-state qualification
  • Evidence qualification and commit-bound semantics
  • Governance receipts and portable decision evidence

Read the Paper

Study the semantic distinctions that keep proposals, context, authority, state, decisions, and execution from collapsing into a single workflow.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Test your understanding of proposal semantics, canonical state, governance context, and receipts.

Take the Quiz
Module 6

The PBSAI Governance Ecosystem

A Multi-Agent AI Reference Architecture for Securing Enterprise AI Estates

Willis, J. M. (2026). The PBSAI Governance Ecosystem: A Multi-Agent AI Reference Architecture for Securing Enterprise AI Estates. arXiv:2602.11301. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.11301

Focus: How a multi-agent cybersecurity ecosystem can organize roles, shared context, structured outputs, and evidence while keeping execution-layer governance distinct.

  • Enterprise AI estate and twelve-domain taxonomy
  • Bounded agent families and shared context envelopes
  • Structured output contracts and governance evidence
  • Separation of agent orchestration from runtime execution governance

Read the Paper

Read the multi-agent reference architecture that provides the enterprise cybersecurity context for the runtime-governance corpus.

Open Reading

Companion PowerPoint

Open or download the PowerPoint presentation that accompanies this paper and video briefing.

Open PowerPoint

Check Your Knowledge

Confirm your understanding of the PBSAI ecosystem, bounded agents, structured outputs, and governance architecture.

Take the Quiz
After the Six Core Readings

AGCP Runtime Governance Assessment Readiness Check

After completing the reading series, use the readiness check to characterize the governance controls you currently have and how far those controls reach toward consequential execution.

The readiness check is a pre-assessment diagnostic, not an AGCP conformance assessment. It is intended to distinguish conventional model safeguards, system guardrails, permissions, approvals, enforcement surfaces, risk re-evaluation, governance compilation, and action-specific runtime governance.

Complete the Learning Pathway

Return to the AI Runtime Governance Learning Guide

After completing all six papers, companion briefings, and knowledge checks, return to the AI Runtime Governance Learning Guide for an integrated review of the series. The guide brings the six readings together and shows how their lessons connect across the execution-governance problem, runtime governance architecture, the AGCP control plane, formal safety semantics, operating semantics, and multi-agent enterprise application.